Like a lot of people in the United States, I've a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government while they see fit. In order to get that pay, I am required to move a urine test, which I have no problem with. I have nothing to hide and the main reason I've no problem with a drug test is. What I do have a problem with may be the distribution of my taxes to people who are doing drugs and never have to go a urine test.

Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to obtain a welfare check, because I've to pass one to generate it for them?

Please comprehend, I've not a problem with helping people get back on their feet. I really do, on another hand, have trouble with helping someone sit on their butt. Can you imagine if people had to pass a urine test to acquire a public assistance check the amount of money the state could save?

A 1999 Michigan law required a pilot program of arbitrary substance abuse testing in at least three areas. Drug assessment started in the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated section of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

Most of the new applicants for that region had to provide a urine test to officials or quit their right to any government assistance. To get further information, please consider checking out: Moreover, any applicants already inside the process had to submit to random testing.

A class action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of schedule testing. For a different interpretation, consider checking out: The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. A Detroit company and two Michigan parents (The Westside Mothers) were named in the match. The corporation centers around representing hundreds of welfare recipients and their families. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan states, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country can be put through a search by the government until there's reasonable suspicion that they've committed some crime, welfare recipients may be bad, but that's not a not yet, anyway."

I've spoken to several people in person and on forums about their views and those that oppose this have the exact same stance, that it is unconstitutional. In the event people need to identify extra information on, there are heaps of online libraries people should investigate. For me, it would appear that I'm perhaps not pushing random drug check onto any random resident. The welfare recipient decides to get help from the government. Therefore much like publishing paperwork, you need to submit a urine sample. Another posture people talk about is false positives. Then execute a hair follicle test, well if they declare fake positive.

Then discard the whole welfare system, if urine check are unconstitutional. Let your voice be heard on Political Socaltreatmentcenter.Com/Drug Detoxification Process.Html includes more about the reason for this view.

For those who have any kind of concerns regarding exactly where in addition to how you can make use of, you'll be able to call us from the website.